§   What's New   ||  Search   ||  Legal Archive  ||  Wog Media  ||  Cult Media  ||  CoW ® ||  Writings  ||  Fun  ||  Disclaimer  ||  Contact  §

   

 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

9652

ANDREW H. WILSON, ESQ., State Bar #063209
LINDA M. FONG, ESQ., State Bar  #124232
WILSON, RYAN & CAMPILONGO
115 Sansome Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94104
(415) 391-3900
(415) 954-0938 (fax)

LAURIE J. BARTILSON, ESQ., State Bar #139220
MOXON & BARTILSON
6255 Sunset Boulevard, Ste. 2000
Hollywood, CA 90028
(213) 960-1936
(213) 953-3351 (fax)

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL

[stamp]
FILED
JAN 30 1996
HOWARD HANSON
MARIN COUNTY CLERK
BY: E. Keswick Deputy

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF MARIN

CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,
a California not-for-profit
religious corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

GERALD ARMSTRONG, et al.,

Defendants.

 )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 157 680

[CONSOLIDATED]

[Initial GWT]
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION
OF PLAINTIFF FOR
[HW] Sum of Adj of ISSUES
DEPT : 1
[HW] Summary of Adjudication
Trial Date: None

 

 

 
   

 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

9653

This matter came on for hearing on December 1, 1995, on motion

of Plaintiff Church of Scientology International for (1) Summary

Adjudication of the First Cause of Action of Armstrong's First

Amended Complaint; (2) Severance; (3) Dismissal of Unadjudicated

Claims; and (4) Entry of Final Judgment.

Plaintiff Church of Scientology International appeared by its

attorneys, Andrew H. Wilson of Wilson, Ryan & Campilongo and Laurie

J. Bartilson of Moxon & Bartilson. Defendant Armstrong appeared by

his attorney, Ford Greene. Having read and considered the moving

and opposing papers, and the evidence and arguments presented

therein and at the hearing, and good cause appearing:

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Motion of Plaintiff for Summary Adjudication of the

First Cause of Action of the Armstrong's First Amended Cross-

complaint is DENIED. As to the first cause of action of defendant's

cross-complaint, plaintiff has failed to meet its burden of showing

that the Court has determined the enforceability of paragraphs 7I

and 18E of the Settlement Agreement. The motions directed at the

fourth, sixth, thirteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth and nineteenth

causes of action only involved paragraph 7D of the Settlement

Agreement. (See plaintiff's Exhibits C and D to Request for

Judicial Notice.) Defendant does not dispute that "paragraphs 4A

and 4B concern an appeal which has already become final, and as a to

which no rights, duties or obligations could be enforced in the

future." (See plaintiff's Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts,

Number 3) The Order of Permanent Injunction did not find violations

of paragraphs 7I and 18E. (See plaintiff's Request for Judicial

Notice, Exhibit E, p. 2, ¶4.);
 

1
   

 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

9654

2. Plaintiff's motion is sever is GRANTED. The Fraudulent

Conveyance Action (original Marin County Superior Court Case No.

157680) is severed from the Breach of Contract Action (original

Marin County Superior Court Case No. 152229, also Los Angeles

Superior Court Case No. BC 052395). Further, all activity in the

Fraudulent Conveyance Action is STAYED during the pendency of

Armstrong's bankruptcy case;

3. The first, second, third, fifth, seventh, eighth, ninth,

tenth, eleventh, twelfth, fourteenth, fifteenth and eighteenth

causes of action of plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for breach

of  contract are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to C.C.P.

§581(c);

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT

in favor of plaintiff in accordance with the Orders of Summary

Adjudication and Permanent Injunction attached hereto as Exhibits A,

B and C;

5. Plaintiff, Church of Scientology International, is

ADJUDICATED the prevailing party in this action, pursuant to Civil

Code Section 1717, and is awarded its attorney's fees and costs

pursuant to that section and the contract between the parties.

Dated: 1 - 24, 1996 [stamp] GARY W. THOMAS
GARY W. THOMAS
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

 

Submitted by:

Laurie Bartilson
MOXON & BARTILSON

 

 

2
   

 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

9655

WILSON, RYAN & CAMPILONGO

BY: [signed] Andrew H. Wilson
Andrew H. Wilson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:                      
Ford Greene, Esq.
HUB LAW OFFICES
Attorney for Defendants
GERALD ARMSTRONG and THE GERALD
ARMSTRONG CORPORATION

By:                      
Michael Walton, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants MICHAEL
WALTON and SOLINA WALTON
 

3
   

 

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

9656

WILSON, RYAN & CAMPILONGO

By:                      
Andrew H. Wilson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: [signed] Ford Greene
Ford Greene, Esq.
HUB LAW OFFICES
Attorney for Defendants
GERALD ARMSTRONG and THE GERALD
ARMSTRONG CORPORATION

By:                      
Michael Walton, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants MICHAEL
WALTON and SOLINA WALTON
 

3

 

§   What's New   ||  Search   ||  Legal Archive  ||  Wog Media  ||  Cult Media  ||  CoW ® ||  Writings  ||  Fun  ||  Disclaimer  ||  Contact  §