From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Fair Game Timeline
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 09:48:31 -0700
Message-ID: <ntmde0589uohupacj1jgtgggd6clgeacg3@4ax.com>
References: <40e47e0f$0$17088$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com> <40E613D8.4070003@rochester.rr.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.82.237.229
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.82.237.229
X-Trace: 3 Jul 2004 11:48:45 -0400, 24.82.237.229
X-Original-Trace: 3 Jul 2004 11:48:45 -0400, 24.82.237.229
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 159
Path: news2.lightlink.com
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1718107

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 02:03:04 GMT, Tanya Durni
<tdurni@rochester.rr.com> wrote:

>wbarwell wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> 1980
>> HCOPL 22 July 80
>> CANCELLATION OF FAIR GAME - MORE ABOUT
>>
>> I have not seen this.
>>
>> Supposedly cancels Fair Game.
>> But was not written by L.Ron Hubbard who
>> supposedly is only person in Scientology
>> that is authorized to write HCOPLs.
>> Thus is probably not 'legal' in Scientology.
>> Was itself cancelled by HCOPl 8 Sept 83
>
>Hubbard Communications Office
>Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
>
>HCO Policy Letter of 23 July 1980
>
>ETHICS
>CANCELLATION OF FAIR GAME, MORE ABOUT
>
>Ref: HCO PL 7 Feb 65R
> HCOB 27 Sep 66
> HCO PL 24 Feb 69
> HCO PL 24 Feb 72 I
> HCO PL 16 May 80 II
> HCO PL 9 Jul 80
> HCO PL 12 Jul 80
>
>In a low toned society, people can identify any justice action or symbol with
>oppression. There is a tiny minority in society who will rail against any
>effort to forward decent and fair justice, and who will portray such efforts as
>reprehensible by alter-ising (changing) them.
>
>This policy clarifies the cancellation of a former Scientology justice process
>called "Fair Game". The purpose of this policy letter was to bring about a
>clear under-standing of what Fair Game was and why it was canceled and to
>prevent any alter-is of its former purpose and functions.
>
>"Fair Game" first appeared in Scientology ethics terminology in 1965. It was a
>term used only in connection with individuals who had been expelled from the Church.
>
>Its use was discontinued in 1966.
>
>(Lots more blah, blah, blah followed by...)
>
>REASON FOR CANCELLATION OF "FAIR GAME"
>
>"Fair Game" was canceled and has remained canceled because it was found that it
>could be misinterpreted by those antipathetic to Scientology to authorize
>justice actions of a more severe nature than expulsion.

This is another admission that it's the *term* "Fair Game, not the
philosophy, policy and practice of Fair Game, that was "cancelled."

Because Scientology won't admit that Fair Game is its policy, and
never has admitted that Fair Game is its policy, when it has always
been its policy, the cult can't ever cancel the policy. They can only
"cancel" using the term "Fair Game" for their basic philosophy, policy
and practice.

Ironically, since the Scientologists can't use the correct, specific
term for their basic philosophy, policy and practice, they are stuck
with calling Fair Game "Scientology." When Scientologists Fair Game a
wog(R), the Scientologists will declare not that they are "Fair
Gaming" the victim, but that they are simply applying "Scientology."

By denying Fair Game, when all they can do is Fair Game, and calling
what they do "Scientology," the Scientologists in fact acknowledge
Fair Game as Scientology, which is what it is.

Fair Game *is* Scientology's basic philosophy, policy and practice.
Fair Game is held in place as the basic philosophy, policy and
practice by the policy that only permits Scientologists to *project*
as the highest mental state they can attain. They must project
criminality onto their targets and victims. They call this "being OT."
There are higher states easily available to human beings, but
Scientologists are not permitted these higher states because of their
*law* to always attack, never defend.

Scientologists are stuck with always attacking, stuck with projection,
and stuck with Fair Game. Scientologists' denial of Fair Game is an
act of Fair Game because it is a lie, it is unreasonable, and it is an
unjustified, cruel attack on Fair Game victims.

>
>(More blah, blah, blah ending with...)
>
>We have in Scientology a technology to help free Man.
>
>It is a big job but we are getting it done. Our justice system helps make the
>job easier by keeping the route open for everybody.
>
>So let's continue to make sure it remains pure in its application.
>
>Doing this, we all can win.
>
>THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
>OF THE CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY
>
>BDCS:dr
>Copyright (c) 1980
>by L. Ron Hubbard
>ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
>
>>
>> 1983
>> HCOPL 8 Sept 83
>> CANCELLATIONS OF ISSUES ON SUPPRESSIVE ACTS AND PTs
>>
>> I have not seen this.
>>
>> Cancels HCOPL 22 July 80
>>
>> 1987
>> HCOPL 24 September 87
>> CONFIDENTIAL
>> BATTLE TACTICS
>> ISSUE II
>> Reissue of 15 September 1969
>> Issued with various GO investigator hat packs.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1994
>> ROBERT VAUGHN YOUNG DECLARATION
>> 10 Oct 94
>> In the case of Dr. Uwe geertz and Steven Fishman, RVY as
>> expert witness delivered this declaration in response
>> to a declaration by Scientology lawyer Lynn Farney.
>> This declaration is concerned largely with the Fair Game
>> policies of Scientology.
>>
>> 1995
>> RELIGION OR INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
>> THE VIEW FROM THE LION'S DEN
>> Jon Atack
>> October 1995
>> A report on Scientology delivered at the Dialog Centre
>> International conference in Berlin
>> A good source on Scientology's fair game policies
>> and related matters.
>>
>> "The Hubbard Policy letter that introduced Fair Game
>> asserted that individuals considered suppressive persons
>> could be the subject of "1st degree murder, arson,
>> disintergration of persons or belongings."
>>
>> ************************ END ****************************

© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org