From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: fair Game again - Amprinistics
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:12:54 -0700
Message-ID: <vr5be0dir20d6p8ji0dbn2brqoo9cs2tg3@4ax.com>
References: <40e11b2a$0$17094$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com> <j3j3e0tk2tm95i4em25mf1rsto2lshgc1g@4ax.com> <40e1fa75$0$17093$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com> <60m6e0hhlrhefh38gtsggjkol7rstep2al@4ax.com> <40e3b37b$0$17090$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.82.237.229
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.82.237.229
X-Trace: 2 Jul 2004 12:13:09 -0400, 24.82.237.229
X-Original-Trace: 2 Jul 2004 12:13:09 -0400, 24.82.237.229
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 402
Path: news2.lightlink.com
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1717840

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 01:49:03 -0400, wbarwell
<wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:

>Gerry Armstrong wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:27:14 -0400, wbarwell
>> <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>>
>
>**********************************
>
>>
>> All the channels of attack remain in operation today: legal, PR,
>> intel, finance. As long as the Suppressive Person doctrine remains in
>> effect Fair Game must remain in effect, because Fair Game is the
>> execution, or application, of the Suppressive Person doctrine.
>> Whatever anyone does in execution of the SP doctrine is an act of fair
>> game.
>>
>> Notice this too on the Miscavige regime's intel checksheet:
>>
>> [Quote]
>>
>> *13. HCO PL 16 Feb 69 II BATTLE TACTICS ___ ___ ___
>>
>> 14. DEMO: 5 examples of the following stable datum:
>> "We must ourselves fight on the basis of total
>> attrition of the enemy. So never get reasonable
>> about him. Just go all the way in and obliterate
>> him."
>>
>> [End Quote]
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/osa-int-ed-508r.html
>>
>> "Battle Tactics" is a "starrate" checksheet item.
>>
>> The actions Hubbard orders in "Battle Tactics" that Scientologists are
>> to take against Suppressive Persons include:
>> - waging a war of total attrition;
>> - going all the way in and obliterating them;
>> - expending the maximum of SPs;
>> - making the war costly to the SPs;
>> - cutting off SPs' communications;
>> - cutting off SPs' funds;
>> - cutting off SPs' connections;
>> - depriving SPs of political advantages;
>> - depriving SPs of connections;
>> - depriving SPs of power;
>> - taking over SPs' territory;
>> - raiding SPs;
>> - harassing SPs;
>> - making the SPs attack wrong targets or persons;
>> - bringing public opinion to a frenzy of hate against SPs;
>> - using standard wartime propaganda against SPs;
>> - degrading the image of SPs to beast level;
>> - capturing and using SPs' comm lines;
>> - treating all skirmishes with SPs like war.
>
>
>Battle Tactics.
>
>Do you know when this was written?

February 16, 1969. At that time, the Foster Inquiry was happening, and
Hubbard was probably aboard the Apollo in Corfu, about to get one of
those big boots.

>When it first was circulated?

Immediately. This was in the GO period. Hubbard wrote four policy
letters for the GO on that date: "Enemy Names," "Battle Tactics,"
"Enemy PRO's," and "Targets Defense." These PLs appear together on
the GO Intel checksheet, which is dated September 9, 1974.

[Quote]

PART D - STRATEGY

1. Appendix II Scientific Method in DMSMH
__________

2. Note: Clausewitz 1st Reciprocal
*__________

3. PL 16 Feb 69, Confidential, Enemy Names
M7__________
M4__________
*__________

4. Drill: Locate in recent newspaper a hostile
commentator (not necessarily hostile to
Scn) to any group of person
__________

5. Essay: What to do with Enemy Names and relation
with PR
__________

6. PL 16 Feb 69, Confidential, Battle Tactics
M7__________
M4__________
*__________

7. Clay demo: The end product of our war
__________

8. Essay: Good Intelligence pin points who, when,
where, what
__________

9. PL 16 Feb 69, Confidential, Enemy PRO's
M7__________
M4__________
*__________

10. Clay demo: Tracing back each name to find the
organisation in common
__________

11. Drill: Go to files and go through some past entheta
articles and spot enemy PRO's. Write up what
you find, the party lines and non-sequitur
responses.
__________

12. PL 16 Feb 69, Confidential, Targets Defense
M7__________
M4__________
*__________

13. Clay demo: Defense is only effective when one
sorties or attacks
__________

14. Essay: Take each target, write up several ways
in which Intell can bring it about.
__________

[End Quote]
http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/cos/SecrServ/ic_conts.htm

Is that first entry above in the "Strategy" section a hoot? " Appendix
II Scientific Method in DMSMH."

>
>This is rather interesting as it does go right to the heart of the matter.
>Not only is Fair Game policy, but it has been enlarged, systemized,
>and made a bit more organized.

The "Fair Game policy" has been a case of propaganda by redefinition
of words. The cult has tried to make the "Hubbard Communications
Office Policy Letter" entitled "Penalties for Lower Conditions" and
dated October 18, 1967 be "The Fair Game Policy."
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/sp/pl-1967-10-18-penalties-for-lower-conds.html
So that then Hubbard and his cult could "cancel" the policy letter and
cancel the "Fair Game Policy."

Nothing has changed in the Fair Game policy, which is the execution,
or, as the Scientologists say, application of the Suppressive Person
doctrine, since 1967. "Battle Tactics" is a statement of Fair Game.
The Fair Game policy is not dependent on the cancellation or not of
one Policy Letter. The Fair Game policy is dependent only on the
cancellation or not of the SP doctrine. And as the cult's own current
hate publications show, the Suppressive Person doctrine is very
uncancelled and very much in force as Scientology.

When Miscavige gloats that his cultists are "shooting down SPs like
ducks in a pond," he's gloating about Fair Gaming people. Shooting
down SPs *is* Fair Game.

>
>
>
>If Fair Game is no longer practiced, Battle Tactics is.
>And its obviously just as bad, even if one accepeted
>(wrongly) that Fair Game was cancelled.
>As far as Fair Game, back in 1995, When Helena Cobrin
>occasionally still posted here, we had this Fair Game debate,
>and Cobrin, who was at that time a lawyer directly representing
>RTC, posted in a answer to my postings on Fair Game
>that Fair Game had been cancelled back in 1968, probably
>like Mushroomman, claiming the revised "Lower conditions" HCOPL
>had cancelled the earlier "Lower Conditions" HCOPL.
>I had though at that time it was the "cancellation" HCOPL
>she was refering to, probably it wasn't. Ignoring the testimony
>that Fair Game was a 1st amendment protected religous practice in
>several trials.
>Such an honest women.

All Scientologists lie about Fair Game. Deep down they all know it's
repugnant. They have no choice, however, but to be Fair Gamers because
Fair Game is the application of the Suppressive Person doctrine,
which, to be a Scientologist, a person must accept and apply.

As ordered in HCOPL February 7, 1965 "Keeping Scientology Working,"
each of the following are "Suppressive Acts:"

1. Not having the Suppressive Person doctrine "technology;"

2. Not knowing the Suppressive Person doctrine "technology;"

3. Not knowing the Suppressive Person doctrine "technology" is
correct;

4. Not teaching correctly the "correct" Suppressive Person doctrine
"technology;"

5. Not applying the Suppressive Person doctrine "technology;"

6. Not seeing that the Suppressive Person doctrine "technology" is
correctly applied;

7. Not hammering out of existence incorrect Suppressive Person
doctrine "technology;"

8. Not knocking out incorrect applications of the Suppressive Person
doctrine "technology;"

9. Not closing the door on any possibility of incorrect Suppressive
Person doctrine "technology;"

10. Not closing the door on incorrect application of the Suppressive
Person doctrine "technology."
http://www.carolineletkeman.org/refund/docs/pl-ksw1.html

And application of the Suppressive Person doctrine is Fair Game. If
Scientologists do not Fair Game, they will be guilty of Suppressive
Acts, and, in application of the SP doctrine, they will be Fair Gamed.

>
>So the Mushrooman style "arguments" are not without interest, as
>someone, some day may meet them again in court.

Oh, the practitioners of the Suppressive Person doctrine we shall meet
again in court, we shall meet again on the beaches, we shall meet on
the landing grounds, we shall meet in the fields and in the streets,
we shall meet in the hills. We SPs shall never stop meeting the
practitioners of this diabolical doctrine and all their "arguments"
and lies; we shall never surrender.

>
>If a fair gamed victim was in court, most likely the
>"Battle Stations" star rated list would be of some legal interest.
>
>
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/pl-battle-tactics.html
>>
>> All of these "battle tactics" are part and parcel of Fair Game.
>>
>> Hubbard defined his term "stable datum" in his book Problems of Work:
>>
>> [Quote]
>>
>> Any body of knowledge is built from one datum. That is its stable
>> datum. Invalidate it and the entire body of knowledge falls apart. A
>> stable datum does not have to be the correct one. It is simply the one
>> that keeps things from being a confusion and on which others are
>> aligned.
>>
>> [End Quote]
>>
>> The Miscavige regimers have made their war of total attrition and
>> obliteration of SPs the cult's "stable datum." That is, Fair Game is
>> Scientology's "stable datum, " the datum that keeps Scientology from
>> falling apart, that keeps things in Scientology from being a
>> confusion.
>>
>> Indeed, Fair Game, which is Scientology's war on SPs in execution of
>> the "Suppressive Person" doctrine, is observably what keeps the entire
>> body of Scientology "knowledge" from falling apart.
>>
>> Invalidating Fair Game is done by SPs simply refusing to be
>> obliterated. Every day a.r.s. exists it shows Fair Game's invalidity.
>> The cultists' ridiculously dishonest denial of Fair Game (when it's
>> their stable datum) also demonstrates this criminal policy's complete
>> absence of validity.
>>
>>>
>>>Mushroom man, can you hear this duck quacking?
>>>"Were you there? you asked.
>>>Armstrong was.
>>
>> Funny, isn't it, Mushroom man. All Scientologists are by your own
>> definition quacks.
>> http://www.carolineletkeman.org/refund/docs/admin-dictionary-quack.html
>>
>> Then there's your little duck fakir boss:
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/fun/parody/dm-duck-fakir.html
>>
>> And there's the little fakir claiming to be "shooting down SPs like
>> 'ducks in a pond.'"
>> http://www.carolineletkeman.org/refund/docs/isn-20-p-8-9.html
>>
>> Ducks are a big LFBD item for you quacks. You're forced to be quacks
>> by a little goose-stepping tyrant, and you have to obey the fakir or
>> you'll be shot down like ducks in a pond too.
>>
>> Why don't you folks just take the little guy, quack him around a bit,
>> and tell him to get plucked. He's duck soup.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> What actions are Scientologists going to take if some wog® sets up a
>>>> "Sauna Program?"
>>>>
>>>> Well, the Scientologists would ask themselves, what would Ron do? And
>>>> for all the doers it's right there in policy, on which they've been
>>>> checked out three times on their checksheet. [ ___ ___ ___ ]
>>>>
>>>> The Scientologists would harass these persons who ran these saunas
>>>> that compete with the Scientology cult's sauna operation in any
>>>> possible way.
>>>>
>>>> The Scientologists would label publicly the people running the saunas
>>>> that compete with the cult's sauna operation as Suppressive Persons
>>>> and their ideas as simply Suppressive Actions to deny people case
>>>> gains.
>>>>
>>>> The Scientologists would tear up any meeting held by the people
>>>> running the saunas that compete with the cult's sauna operation, and
>>>> get the names of those attending and issue SP orders on them.
>>>>
>>>> And the Scientologists would view anyone who attends the meetings or
>>>> saunas of the people running the saunas that compete with the cult's
>>>> sauna operation as a lot of rats to be disposed of happily.
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> There has been unbroken continuity in the "Suppressive Person"
>>>> doctrine and its implementation for 50 years. It has simply become
>>>> increasingly focused and the cult has had increasing wealth to pour
>>>> into implementation.
>>>>
>>>> The SP doctrine seen in Hubbard's 1965 "Amprinistics" issue is in fact
>>>> a huge money-maker for the cult. Remember, the SP doctrine is both
>>>> "tech" and "admin," and obviously "ethics." It's an essential element
>>>> in the cult's "business management" system in any Scientology or WISE
>>>> business. It's a very effective business concept. Hateful and
>>>> criminal, of course, but nevetheless effective.
>>>>
>>>> The cult's leaders have apparently been tremendously encouraged by the
>>>> success of the SP doctrine, and, in execution of this doctrine, have
>>>> committed so many crimes that they have made themselves blind to just
>>>> how hateful the doctrine is. Take a look at the hate literature these
>>>> folks are now pumping out about shattering SPs, the courses they're
>>>> selling to teach all Scientologists to shatter SPs, and the millions
>>>> they're making selling this hate and these courses in hating.
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://www.suppressiveperson.org/hate/promo/isn-24-cvr-ad.html
>>>> http://www.suppressiveperson.org/hate/promo/isn27-45.html
>>>> http://www.suppressiveperson.org/hate/promo/living-351-cvr.html
>>>>
>>>> The cult can claim forever that "fair game is cancelled," but they
>>>> dare not ever claim that the "Suppressive Person" doctrine is
>>>> cancelled. They have put all their eggs in the SP basket. The SP
>>>> doctrine is worse, uglier and more criminal than fair game. It is the
>>>> source of fair game.
>>>
>>>
>>>They can claim it but it is false.
>>>Some day, it will come back to bite them.
>>
>> It is. Both the doctrine and this corollary to the doctrine -- the
>> claim that it is not the doctrine -- are coming back. It's possibly
>> some kind of heavenly equation, but it isn't necessary to see that to
>> see that their denial of their doctrines in time and at times comes
>> back to bite them.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> People are only starting to understand what the Suppressive Person
>>>> doctrine is, but this is an understanding that people will get. The
>>>> doctrine isn't going anywhere, however, and the whole world has years
>>>> to study this insane idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>SP doctrine is simply the Fair Game policies under another name.
>>
>> Correct. Fair game is the treatment of SPs. The "cancellation" PL
>> specifically does not cancel the pre-"cancellation" "treatment" of
>> SPs. Hubbard simply said that the SP doctrine continues, but don't use
>> the term 'Fair Game' as it causes bad PR.
>>
>> He neglected to tell the Scientologists executing his madness that the
>> "Suppressive Person" doctrine, on the other hand, does *not* cause
>> good PR. In fact, the SP doctrine is worse.
>>
>>>Who do you fair game? SPs. What are SPs? people who get in
>>>your way.
>>
>> That's correct. And how do Scientologists "know" this? Because they
>> have the "tech" to spot SPs. And having spotted them, to shatter SPs.
>> How do they know they have the tech to spot and shatter SPs? Because
>> Hubbard said it's the tech. Isn't that just ducky!
>>
>> © Gerry Armstrong
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org

© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org