From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Hubbard "Admissions" (Was L.
Ron
Hubbard never asked psychs for help!)
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 13:47:53 +0200
Message-ID: <v31ggvc209eupbb0p6c92rnqqqb348jgff@4ax.com>
References: <8385d874.0306280756.2f2ca7c3@posting.google.com> <bdl7qh
$8rb$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk>
<MPG.196bf3a81dbc721989721@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net> <vg98t9htq1sc1e
@corp.supernews.com>
<b05bgvci9f3dped47ihkit7q5jrund9uge@4ax.com>
<aHVja2xl.d622c8b0995f0c66efdd54fad3a0e01c@1057377806.cotse.net>
<bdhdgvkk3r6puvfds66t07v8nescf5uhlm@4ax.com> <vgeob3fmkk5738
@corp.supernews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.88.232.7
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.88.232.7
X-Trace: 6 Jul 2003 07:47:58 -0400, 217.88.232.7
X-Original-Trace: 6 Jul 2003 07:47:58 -0400, 217.88.232.7
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 290
Path: news2.lightlink.com
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1625254
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 23:37:01 GMT, frice@skeptictank.org (Fredric L.
Rice) wrote:
>Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote:
>>On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 20:03:26 -0800 (AKDT), "blackdog"
>><blackdog-no-spam@hoy.cotse.net> wrote:
>>> Nevertheless, if the CofS representatives *did* actually sign the
>>> mutual release as you have presented it, that is, in itself,
hardly
>>> conclusive proof that Hubbard did indeed author the "
Admissions"
or
>>> "Affirmations."
>
>>No one was saying it was "conclusive proof." The
preponderance
of the
>>evidence, however, including Hubbard's own writing to the Court about
>>his documents in Scientology v. Armstrong, LA Superior Court case no.
>>C 420153, was sufficient to "prove" that he was the author.
I would
>>say that the evidence presented was viewed by the judge as "
conclusive
>>proof," and also by Scientology's lawyers as "conclusive
proof;"
>>otherwise they would have challenged the document's authenticity.
>
>Don't forget that the criminal enterprise was quite annoyed with your
>submitting of these documents back into the public domain, to the tune
>that they claimed you some how owed them $50,000 for doing so.
Actually, they didn't. But what they did, and didn't, do is even more
revealing, and disgusting, and hilarious.
You see, the cult and its attorneys did *not* claim the usual $50,000
for my posting of the "Admissions." See these crooks' "breaches
list"
at
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/breaches.html
Among my more than 3000 posts to a.r.s., one would think that the
"Admissions" post would be one of the most valuable; or, from the
crime cultists' viewpoint, one of the most costly.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/ars/ars-2000-03-11.html
Yet this posting of the "Admissions," which contains a lengthy
introduction by me that details some of my knowledge and experiences
in relation to the cult, is glaringly missing from the "breaches
list."
Compare the meat and value of the "Admissions" post with, e.g.,
this
post, for which the Scientology criminals want their $50,000.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=37343994.170813948%40news.dowco.com&
oe=UTF8&output=gplain
Here's all I write in this post:
[Quote]
I would imagine that as soon as we fire up this new ARSCCWDNE
litigation juggernaut, Dennis will be real early on the deposition
list. They can muzzle a horse, but you can't make him hide. Wear a
blue bathrobe, Dennis, so our process server can ID you.
......
I'll say $1,500,000. That's my figure.
(c) Gerry Armstrong
[End Quote]
The only reference to the criminal Scientology cult in everything I
wrote is the letter "S." These villains want $50,000 if I just say
"S!"
Yet they don't seek anything for my posting Hubbard's "Admissions!
"
I believe that this adds even more evidence to the already existing
conclusive proof that the "Admissions" are Hubbard's.
Note too how the cultists and their gangster lawyers describe this
post on their "breaches list."
[Quote]
49. 8 May 1999 Posting by Armstrong in which he guesses how much
Dennis Erlich received in his settlement with the Church.
[End Quote]
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/breaches.html
This is a complete lie. These felons pretended to dub this in just to
gain another $50,000 in dirty money. I wasn't guessing how much Dennis
received from the cult at all. I stated, "I'll say $1,500,000. That's
my figure."
My figure has now changed, but back on May 8, 1999 it was $1,500,000.
> I've
>seen the document -- in Word or PDF format; I don't recall -- and it
>all looks completely in agreement with what's know about Hubbard.
>
>But a preponderance of all available evidence shows that these so-called
>"Admissions" are fully in keeping with the evidenced mindset of
the
>mad man. There's nothing inconsistant about them when compared against
>themselves and against the wealth of other documentation widely
>available on the Internet.
>
>They're convincingly genuine. If evidence comes to light later that
>they are in fact forgeries or some how altered or incomplete, I'd like
>to evaluate it. As it is, noting that the insane mad man tried to get
>his little cult of criminals to get a Nobel Peace Prize for him kind
>of underscores the fact that these "Admissions" are genuine.
>
>>> This document was allegedly taken by you from the LRH archives
and
>>>presented as a Hubbard-authored document in the court case the
CofS
>>>brought against you in the early 80s.
>
>>No, that's a false allegation. The document was given to me by Omar
>>Garrison, and parts were entered into evidence in the Scientology v.
>>Armstrong case, after authentication. See:
>>
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/breckenridge-decision.html
>>Appendix at 14:18-21
>
>And as such they're public domain, right? No Judge ever sealed these
>documents.
They were sealed at one time. But they're not sealed now. My reasons
for posting them, and the conditions in which I posted them, are
stated in my introduction to the "Admissions."
The cult is no respecter of copyrights, and has copied, disseminated
and made many millions from my copyrighted materials. What then are
we, the cult's targets for obliteration, to do?
The cult has no legitimate copyright infringement claim against me. My
posting of the "Admissions" is completely within fair use
guidelines.
The context for the posting is everything Hubbard ever wrote and
everything ever written about him and about Scientology, Dianetics,
Jack Parsons, Sara, Crowley, WW II, and a thousand other subjects.
Really, we should demand that the cult publish the original Hubbard
handwritten "Admissions" so that any Scientologists in doubt about
their authenticity can see that they're authentic. It's up to the
bosses who run Scientology to prove they're authentic, not me.
Scientologists should get together and demand of their little dictator
that he cough up the originals.
>
>>>What should be emphasized here is that you, and your attorney at
the
>>>time, offered this as an *actual* Hubbard-authored document. My
opinion
>>>is that the CofS' main concern at this time was the recovery of
these
>>>stolen documents
>
>They're not "stolen documents."
Correct. This is the standard Miscavige-Scientology-CLOp lie and
black propaganda that becomes no less a lie and no less black PR each
time these criminals say it.
>
>>>and that the idea that this and possibly other
>>>"documents" taken from the Hubbard archives might be
deliberately
>>>planted pieces of disinformation was just not foremost in their
minds.
>
>And there's no reason to plant anything about Hubbard given that his
>insanity and core criminality was well established long before these
>documents came to light. I mean the fucking megalomania kook kidnapped
>his own daughter and engaged in ritual sex magic with Jack Parsons
>long before the FBI startd digging deeply into his felonies.
>
>>No, your opinion is wrong. The cult and the attorneys knew beyond any
>>doubt that the document was Hubbard's. That is why they didn't
>>challenge its authenticity. There is no doubt that if they thought
>>they could have challenged the authenticity of any of the Armstrong
>>documents they would have done so in a flash.
>
>Yep.
>
>>They would have been, I'm sure they realized, extremely foolish to
>>challenge the authentic document's authenticity. If they had averred
>>that it wasn't Hubbard's document, and that he therefore made no
>>possessory claim to it, the document could have been released to me on
>>the spot. I could have then made a billion copies of the authentic
>>document, which everyone would know was in fact from Hubbard. The cult
>>lawyers did the only thing they reasonably could have done -- accept
>>the truth that the document is authentic. Which, it is.
>
>Yep. Just like the crooks had to eventually admit that Xenu and the
>flying saucers and Body Thetan claptrap was actually the core bait-and-
>switch frauds of their criminal enterprise -- despite decades of delying
>it in court, in the media, and when ever asked.
>
>>The CL Op is what the cult came up with after admitting to the
>>authenticity of the "Admissions" and after losing the case.
This cult
>>op fakes an attack on the cult's own lawyers, claiming they forged the
>>Hubbard letter to the court, and conspired with my attorneys and me
>>to, among other things, authenticate the Hubbard documents and get him
>>declared a pathological liar.
>
>Amusing, of course. In the crook's attempts to deny the facts of their
>own criminal enterprise, they engage in actions which bring those core
>criminal scams and frauds to light, verified in court. Had the crooks
>just kept silent the information would still be out there but a long,
>long way from being as widely exposed as they are today.
Their efforts to hide their criminal documents and criminality, and to
shudder people into silence has made the cultists and their lawyers
and agents even more criminal.
If they had only acted decently toward me and permitted me my First
Amendment rights I would have long since disappeared as any kind of
problem and gone on to throwing pots. After all, everyone has known
for decades that Hubbard was a pathological liar, a cheat, a
misanthrope, a big baby, a bully and a bigamist.
But by conspiring and acting to deprive me of my basic human rights
the cultists and their lawyers necessarily violated U.S. Federal law,
specifically 18 U.S.C. §241
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/241fin.htm
Since what they are doing is a crime, in fact punishable by up to ten
years in prison, I cannot be silenced about it by any "contract."
And
they are all -- every director, officer, employee, volunteer, agent
and lawyer of every Scientology corporation, organization, group or
affiliated entity -- faced with prosecution for this most obscene
conspiracy and violation of that federal statute. All to silence me
about what has already been said and is universally known.
Since the Marin Superior Court sought to silence and punish me for
communicating about ongoing violations of a U.S. Federal criminal
statute, and sought to unlawfully deprive me of my rights guaranteed
by the U.S. Constitution and laws, the Marin court is in violation of
18 U.S.C. §242 "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law,"
http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/242fin.htm
Thus I cannot be silenced about what the Marin court has done and is
doing, because that too is a crime.
The guilty knowledge of the Marin Judge Gary W. Thomas that what he
was doing was unlawful is evidenced by the facts that he did indeed
try to silence me about his rulings, and sealed the court file
containing his unlawful actions without my agreement.
Consider this as well. The cult's "contract" requires that
Scientology
and its leaders, all the Scientologists who are directors, officers,
employees or volunteers, and the cult's agents and lawyers particpiate
in a federal crime, the violation of 18 U.S.C. §241. If I remained
silent, I would be a party myself to the commission of this crime, and
could myself be imprisoned for my participation. Thus I have a legal
duty to continue to communicate.
If a contract that calls for the commission of a crime can lawfully be
judicially enforced, murder contracts can be judicially enforced. Then
we will see assassins going to jail for not murdering the people they
contracted to murder. And we'd see courts throwing people in jail for
*not* robbing banks. In fact we'd see bank robbers suing cops for
interference with their contractual obligations.
A conspiracy to deprive an individual of his rights is a crime, just
as are bank robbery and murder. And a "contract" that binds a person
to conspire to deprive someone, even himself, of his Constitutional
and legal rights is no less judicially unenforceable than a robbery or
murder "contract."
So Scientology and its criminal leaders, and all the Scientologists
who are directors, officers, employees or volunteers, and all of the
cult's agents and lawyers, are facing a terrible threat that they
themselves created by their stupid inability to do one decent thing
decades ago.
They are so utterly unable to do something decent that it can
truthfully be said that "Scientology makes the able unable." It is
impossible that all those people -- all the cult's directors,
officers, employees or volunteers -- were utterly unable to do
something decent before they became Scientologists. Only through
practicing Scientology did they become unable. They call becoming
utterly unable to do something decent going OT.
I, of course, am facing being assassinated, because these thousands of
criminals involved in all that criminality are apparently still unable
to do a single decent thing. What other option do they have? But what
an incredible indictment of Scientology Scientologists are.
Well, as L. Ron Hubbard postulated, and wrote to the GO when he used
them to deceive, betray and cruelly hurt his own daughter Alexis,
"decency is a subject not well understood." It sure is beyond
Scientology and Scientologists.
Gerry
>
>
>---
>"I spewed bodily fluids." - Shydavid
>http://www.skeptictank.org/ http://www.RonTheNut.ORG/
>PGP Key: http://www.skeptictank.org/frice.pgp
>-- You love drugs! You love drugs, don't you?! You better
>not say anything about my mother! Don't you DARE say anything
>about my mother! -- Scientology's International President (Audio
>files of this nutter at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice
© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org