Path: pd7tw1no!pd7cy1no!shaw.ca!pd7tw3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 70.70.44.129
From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Nineteen Eighty-Four
Message-ID: <l02pa1ttlrcba7iu4cv1fp1r04o77vb07b@4ax.com>
References: <3gv25cFebr47U1@individual.net> <CiAqe.140037$dP1.491376@newsc.telia.net>
<k06ma1l6fsj3cdho3768a5j5nr6dit6gk9@4ax.com> <P2Gqe.27034$d5.178956@newsb.telia.net>
<77joa11impvld52al2ri5lbt9oiidafnb3@4ax.com> <N0Zqe.27116$d5.179061@newsb.telia.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 228
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:16:29 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
X-Trace: pd7tw3no 1118603789 24.67.253.205 (Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:16:29 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:16:29 MDT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
Xref: pd7hu0no alt.religion.scientology:172359
X-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:16:30 MDT (pd7tw1no)
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:02:53 GMT, "Spacetraveler"
<spacetraveler2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Gerry Armstrong" <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote in
message
>news:77joa11impvld52al2ri5lbt9oiidafnb3@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:27:59 GMT, "Spacetraveler"
>> <spacetraveler2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Gerry Armstrong" <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
wrote in message
>> >news:k06ma1l6fsj3cdho3768a5j5nr6dit6gk9@4ax.com...
>> >> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:55:14 GMT, "Spacetraveler"
>> >> <spacetraveler2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >"Mike Gormez" <mgormez@chello.nl>
wrote in message
>> >> >news:3gv25cFebr47U1@individual.net...
>> >> >> George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four (and all
his publications)
>seems
>> >to
>> >> >> be in the public domain in Russia, which extends
it for 50 years
>after
>> >the
>> >> >> death of the author.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> George Orwell (ERIC ARTHUR BLAIR) died in 1950
and so:
>> >> >> http://orwell.ru/library/novels/1984/english/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The parallels to Scientology's Sea Org are schilling
at times.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And to be honest, the parallels with society
are chilling as well,
>with
>> >> >> all the biometric crap governments demanding.
Fe. when all our
>> >> >> identification cards/papers carry our picture,
then with advancing
>> >facial
>> >> >> recognition software you are never again anonymous
when you walk in
>> >camera
>> >> >> rich environments. No longer will security cameras
register a 'man
>> >with
>> >> >> white sneakers and red jack' walking out of a
nudy bar but the
>software
>> >> >> will revail that Mr. <your name here> just
walks out.
>> >> >
>> >> >You may be overlooking one thing, ANY group or organization
has signs
>of
>> >> >what is being revealed in "1984". Simply
because of people, and people
>do
>> >> >like they are 'founded'.
>> >>
>> >> If this is true, that people do like they are 'founded,'
then
>> >> Scientology doesn't work. No one is made different by
doing
>> >> Scientology because they will, Scientology or not, do
like they are
>> >> 'founded.'
>> >
>> >Forgetting one thing again, I wrote 'founded', I did not write
founded.
>And
>> >what is now left of your argument?
>>
>> "Oh" how 'cute' of "you."
>>
>> "You" 'have' *no* "'argument.'"
>
>No, it means you can not duplicate...
You mean I can't 'duplicate' don't 'you?'
>
>>
>> But remember, where it really counts, Scientology is a *murderous*
>> philosophy, not a 'murderous' philosophy.
>
>Right, but you are alive ain't you? Can't be that murderous then...
As with all murderous philosophies, Scientology's murderousness is
limited by its practitioners' cowardice.
Al Qaeda philosophy, without even reading it, is obviously murderous,
and although it includes death to all Americans, there are still
hundreds of millions of Americans still alive.
And there are still a hundred fifty millions SPs still alive,
including me, but Scientology is still a murderous 'philsophy.'
Because of the extreme cowardice Scientology generates in its members,
too terrifed to confront even *ideas* in their own 'philsophy,'
Scientology has adopted the "beastification first" policy. Hubbard,
the inventor of the idea, was clearly a huge coward, so the cowardly
beastification first policy conforms with his psychology.
If I had allowed Scientology and Scientologists to beastify me without
responding to their violent black PR and false charges, it is
altogether likely that the cowardly Scientologists would have felt
emboldened enough to assassinate me. Hubbard's "reasoning" is
that
wogs and wog law enforcement and wog courts won't care a whit about
prosecuting murder if the images of the victims have first been
degraded to beast level.
Since I am willing to fight back against Scientologists'
beastification of me, and the cultists with all of their mass lying,
manipulation and threatening of the media, the cult's hate sites, the
covert ops, and DM himself orchestrating the whole beastification
campaign, have not achieved their objective, and of course since God
gives life, I am still alive.
>
>Spacetraveler
>
>
>>
>> Murderous philosophy, or *murderous* philosophy, or even as you'd
>> shout it, a MURDEROUS philsophy; yes, Scientology is all those
things,
>> but not a 'murderous' philosophy.
>>
>> When you quote me, of course, you can write that I state, and stand
by
>> my statement, that Scientology is a "murderous philosophy."
>>
>> Technically, Scientology is *not* a real philosophy, of course,
as
>> real philosophers understand "philosophy," because it
hates rather
>> than loves wisdom, and in fact punishes members who seek wisdom
or get
>> the idea that they'd love wisdom.
>>
>> It is therefore correct to call Scientology a murderous 'philsophy,'
>> *murderous* 'philsophy' or, as you'd say, MURDEROUS 'philsophy."
>>
>> >
>> >If it ws true that Scientology does not work, it would not
still exist
>this
>> >very day, that in spite of all oppostion, infiltration and
I don't know
>> >what.
>>
>> Untrue.
>>
>> Insanity in all sorts of forms doesn't work, yet those forms exist.
>> Scientology is a form of insanity. So, big deal.
>>
>> Scientology 'works' for Scientologists just like the other forms
of
>> insanity work for their insane practitioners, but that doesn't
mean
>> that for the non-insane Scientology actually works or that the
other
>> forms of insanity actually work.
>>
>> If Scientology 'works' for you, it only means one thing: you're
>> insane.
>>
>> >
>> >Spacetraveler
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> In that Scientology has been proven to not work, with
many proofs from
>> >> many angles beyond this, your behavior is, even if you
believe none of
>> >> it and faked everything, psychopathic.
>> >>
>> >> You pontificate about trying the things, that it's all
about doing,
>> >> yet you have not even tried what we're talking about.
You won't do the
>> >> research. You're a coward. Cowardice is the VFP of Scientology.
>> >>
>> >> Yet the proof is so obvious any wog can see it, so easy
any wog can do
>> >> it, and believe me it can give you a level of knowingness
about this
>> >> subject you otherwise would never have.
>> >>
>> >> 1. Stop doing Scientology just for one month.
>> >>
>> >> 2. At the end of that time observe any difference.
>> >>
>> >> I would postulate that there will be no difference, and
further that
>> >> if there is no difference, then Scientology could not
have made any
>> >> difference. Thus in terms of doing anything, as in working,
there
>> >> would be no reason to go back to doing Scientology. Add
in the money
>> >> and time you'd save over the next endless trillions of
years and
>> >> there'd be immediate life-changing benefits
>> >>
>> >> All it would take is a month. Or even less. It can be
done on a good
>> >> day. There obviously is plenty to do without doing Scientology
because
>> >> billions of wogs have been doing it 24/7 at least back
to the very
>> >> space opera days.
>> >>
>> >> If a month isn't long enough for you to be sure, you could
make the
>> >> experiment a year.
>> >>
>> >> Any other Scientologist can participate or do his or her
own
>> >> experiment. It's really quite a helpful exercise. I'd
like to stay in
>> >> touch with the participants and to aim for publication
of the results,
>> >> and looking toward the creation of future such experiments
in other
>> >> thought control milieux.
>> >>
>> >> There's something else to consider in performing this
experiment, and
>> >> I believe I have a legal obligation to disclose this fact.
The
>> >> Scientology organization has a published "policy"
of giving refunds of
>> >> money paid to do Scientology if requested within three
months of the
>> >> last Scientology the doer did. Therefore any Scientologist
performing
>> >> this experiment would, in my opinion, be advised to do
so in a time
>> >> period well under three months.
>> >>
>> >> Since this experiment, in almost all known cases when
it was tried,
>> >> resulted in the participants' discovery that nothing had
happened,
>> >> consequently proving that Scientology had not worked,
the
>> >> participants, if they perform the experiment honestly,
are motivated
>> >> to seek a refund of whatever they had paid on Scientology's
>> >> representation that it worked.
>> >>
>> >> Completing the experiment in less than three months of
the last time a
>> >> Scientologist did Scientology would ensure that the organization
>> >> refunded the dissatisfied exscientologist wog's payments
without
>> >> argument.
>> >>
>> >> > What should be judged here are the original LRH
>> >> >writings (pre-1980). It appears that LRH exposes such
a plot. For
>example
>> >> >RJ67, but there is a lot more...
>> >> >
>> >> >Don't scrape on the surface, look beyond the length
or your nose...
>> >> >
>> >> >Spacetraveler
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> © Gerry Armstrong
>> >> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
>> >
>>
>> © Gerry Armstrong
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
>
© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
Thread