From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Fair Game Timeline
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:33:41 -0700
Message-ID: <uoqbe0tucvote3rl0l7d5tcs3lelqf65v1@4ax.com>
References: <40e47e0f$0$17088$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com> <ss5be0lvqfhq6i35fmup4gp8vkoqh61sm2@4ax.com>
<9f53d1e2.0407021506.2e8da0f3@posting.google.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.82.237.229
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.82.237.229
X-Trace: 2 Jul 2004 18:33:56 -0400, 24.82.237.229
X-Original-Trace: 2 Jul 2004 18:33:56 -0400, 24.82.237.229
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 118
Path: news2.lightlink.com
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1717948
On 2 Jul 2004 16:06:59 -0700, spacetraveler2000@hotmail.com
(Spacetraveler) wrote:
>Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote in message news:<ss5be0lvqfhq6i35fmup4gp8vkoqh61sm2@4ax.com>...
>> On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:13:19 -0400, wbarwell
>> <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Here is the beginning of a Timeline on Fair Game.
>> >Hardly complete.
>> >More to be added to this later as I get organized.
>>
>> The timeline goes back to Science of Survival. Hubbard's descriptions
>> of the "1.1" are about the "SP." Hubbard's genocidal
solutions; e.g.,
>> disposing of undesirables quietly and without sorrow, are early
>> statements of fair game, and begin to establish the mindset necessary
>> to embrace the "Suppressive Person" doctrine.
>>
>> I would even go back to 1947 and Hubbard's "Admissions." E.g.,
>>
>> [Quote]
>>
>> You use the minds of men. They do not use your mind or affect it in
>> any way. You have a sacred spiritual mind, too strong, too high to be
>> touched. Your league with Higher Beings, your mighty Guardian and the
>> All Powerful, renders you beyond all human criticism.
>>
>> You can distinguish between your doubts and what is said to you. You
>> have no doubts because you have no fear. You are kind and considerate
>> to all because you are so powerful. You need never defend your motives
>> to anyone because your motives are right. You have never done wrong
>> and need never apologize to anyone. You never justify or explain your
>> acts because you are careful that these acts are good and kind.
>>
>> You can be merciless when your will is crossed and you have the right
>> to be merciless.
>>
>> [End Quote]
>>
>> At this point, Hubbard is a sociopath or psychopath, an individual who
>> practices Fair Game, justified with his personal "Suppressive Person"
>> doctrine: "your motives are right." When he organizes people
to attack
>> his "enemies," you have Fair Game, and you have a criminal
conspiracy.
>> Because of its SP doctrine with its Fair Game application, the
>> Scientology organization is accurately called a criminal conspiracy.
>>
>> The first term Hubbard used for the "Suppressive Person" was
"Merchant
>> of Fear," the earliest reference for which I've found is 1953.
>> http://www.suppressiveperson.org/hate/pubs/pab-13-11-1953-on-human-behavior.html
>>
>> You might go through the SPDL site and see what other materials we've
>> got that would fit into your timeline.
>> http://www.suppressiveperson.org/index.html
>> Miscavige's statements and the cult's hate promo brings Fair Game
>> right into present time.
>>
>> Also these pages may have other items:
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/scientology-ethics-orders.html
>> http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/sp/index.html
>>
>> You will also want to add references to and condemnations of Fair Game
>> from Scientology v. Armstrong LASC No. C 420153 (Breckenridge),
the
>> appellate decision in that case, Wollersheim
v. Scientology appellate
>> opinion, Re B & G Wards (Latey
decision). These are important because
>> they show the cult's leaders having knowledge of the execrableness of
>> their Fair Game philosophy, policy and practice.
>
>Gerry,
>
>It seems like that people may not defend themselves when under attack.
What do you mean?
Examples?
>
>On both your site AND that SPDL site the reference actually cancelling
>fair game is not to be found. http://mccalcon.notlong.com
There is no cancellation of fair game. It has never been cancelled.
Certain policy letters may have been "cancelled," but fair game -- the
philosophy, policy and practice -- remains exactly as it was when
Hubbard postulated it as his basic communication mode, his solution
for criticism, decades ago.
But on the subject of "cancellation" of policy letters, please see
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/sp/pl-1968-10-21-cancel-fair-game.html
And now it is your turn to present your proof of your claim that fair
game is actually cancelled. This will be an impossible task because
fair game has never been cancelled.
Policy letters may or may not be policy. Policy letters may or may not
be followed. Policy may be counter to or in violation of what is
stated in policy letters. The policy may be to ignore or act in
violation of what is stated in policy letters.
With the Scientology organization this is quite clearly the policy.
>
>Attack, but do it on 'proper' grounds. Find the 'right' target.
And the "Suppressive Person" doctrine guarantees you won't find the
"right target." The SP doctrine is set up to create wrong targets --
good, loving people to attack. It's really nice for Scientologists to
have a class of people to fair game who are good, loving ones who
don't have the resources or the mindset to attack back. No wonder the
Scientologists feel so OT. Cowards.
The "Suppressive Persons" Scientology targets are no more "right
targets" than all the Jews the Nazis fair gamed were the "right
targets."
>
>Spacetraveler
© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org
|