http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=
868druch7lcgv5pk14pr2u6slr2kmjuom2%
404ax.com&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: APPLYING SCIENTOLOGY: Knowledge-
Responsibility-Control
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:14:57 +0200
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 724
Message-ID: <868druch7lcgv5pk14pr2u6slr2kmjuom2@4ax.com>
References: <18e81488.0210220238.4e99255a@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.16.34.12
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.225.82.107
X-Original-Trace: 23 Oct 2002 09:14:40 -0400, 217.225.82.107
On 22 Oct 2002 03:38:43 -0700, theta@btinternet.com (Theta) wrote:
>HOW TO BOOST YOUR PERSONAL POWER AND COMMAND OF LIFE
>
>You are about to read about one of the most effective
>self-improvement tools ever discovered. This one technique can
>do more for your mental strength, your job performance and your
>overall competence than dozens of self-help books or
>motivational seminars.
>
>This simple formula eliminates self criticism, fear and stress.
No it does not. That is a very typical Scientology lie.
If it did, no Scientologist would be afraid. And they all are afraid.
Otherwise they wouldn't have to do any more silly processing, or your
"application recommendations." And otherwise they wouldn't suppress
people.
And if this "formula," which is not a formula at all, "
worked,"
and
self-criticism was eliminated from a person, what a monster you would
have produced.
Scientology teaches that your self is an illusion of your self. If you
didn't criticize the illusion you'd made of your self you'd probably
not discover that you'd made an illusion. The illusion you've made of
yourself, which is required of all Scientologists, is precisely what
should be criticized. It's unreal.
So the application of your KRC triangle in Scientologists actually
generates ignorance. And ignorance generates hatred. And that's why
Scientology is a hate group -- organization-wide application of your
KRC triangle. See, e.g.,
http://www.gospelcom.net/apologeticsindex/s04f.html
>It is applicable to any situation and works every time. You can
>use it repeatedly without limitation.
Since it is not a formula and does nothing, sure you can. There are
lots of idiocies like this. You use the formula kinks, rejects and
clowns repeatedly without limitation. Try it. It is applicable in
every situation and works every time. I call it the KRC triangle (R).
>
>L. Ron Hubbard discovered the KRC Triangle in 1972.
No he did not. He discovered none of its components, nor did he
discover their relationship to each other. Hubbard was a pathological
liar and you're promoting a pathological lie about the pathological
liar.
>
>================================================
>
>"THE K-R-C TRIANGLE"
>
>"The points are K for KNOWLEDGE, R for RESPONSIBILITY and C
>for CONTROL."
>
>"It is difficult to be responsible for something or control
>something unless you have KNOWLEDGE of it."
Oh, hey, cognootin! Let's call it a religion.
>
>"It is folly to try to control something or even know something
>without RESPONSIBILITY."
Wow!
>
>"It is hard to fully know something or be responsible for
>something over which you have no CONTROL, otherwise the result
>can be an overwhelm."
Well whoop, whoop, whoop!
>
>"Little by little one can make anything go right by
>
>"INCREASING KNOWLEDGE . . . ,"
Wow, without Hubbard no one would have gone to school.
>
>"INCREASING RESPONSIBILITY . . . ,"
>
>"INCREASING CONTROL . . . ."
>
>"If one sorts out any situation one finds oneself in on this
>basis, he will generally succeed."
No, now he's getting into the big Hubbardian lie. It is a lie which
leads to ever decreasing responsibility among Scientologists. They
think being ever less responsible is being ever more responsible,
because while they're pumping this pablum they're also embracing the
diametrically opposed idiocy that what's true is what's true for them.
Thus decreasing responsibility equals increasing responsibility,
simply because it's true for them.
>
>"By inching up each corner of the KRC triangle bit by bit,
>ignoring the losses and making the wins firm, a being at length
>discovers his power and command of life."
No he does not. Not if he's still embracing the idiocy that what's
true is what's true for him. If this idocy is true, then why inch? So
it must be true that he lacks KRC. And thus he's stuck by his own
postulate. What a stupid "tech" <blech>.
>
>- L. Ron Hubbard
>
>================================================
>
>KRC TRIANGLE APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS
>------------------------------------------------
>
>Select a problem and write it down or type it into your computer.
>Then write or type the answers for each of these five steps.
Okay, let's go with one of Scientology's problems and see if your
"formula" or application recommendation works for even one.
The Scientology cult has a problem with Gerry Armstrong. Every
Scientology organization, front group or affiliated entity, including
CST (oops) and all of their directors, officers, employees,
volunteers, agents, PIs, and pettifoggers, including the Lenske
brothers (oops and oops), want to silence Armstrong. They've assaulted
him, run into him with a car, sued him six times, driven him into
bankruptcy, framed him with crimes, filed false criminal charges
against him, driven him from his home in the US, driven him from his
home in Canada, procured warrants for his arrest, libeled him around
the world to silence him. See, e.g.,
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/breckenridge-decision.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/a1/625.php
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a1/appeal/opp-to-mot-to-seal-
record.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a2/ver-2nd-amd-complaint-
052395.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/sep-stmt-20-coa-1995-09-
18.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/injunction-csi-v-
armstrong.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/ord-contempt-1997-06-
05.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/warrant-1997-08-06.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/ord-contempt-1998-2-
20.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/warrant-1998-05-15.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/opposition-for-osc-re-
contempt-152229.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a4/ord-contempt-2001-07-
13.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/complaint-cv021632.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/breaches.html
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/index.html
Armstrong has not wanted to be silenced and has refused to be
silenced. Thus by your cult founder's definition, you and every cult
member, every organization, including CST (oops, did I say oops?) and
all of their directors, including DM (oops), officers, including DM
(oops), employees, including DM (oops), volunteers, including every
vulture minister (oops), every lawyer, including the Lenske (oops),
every PI, and every other sort of agent your cult employees, has a
problem. Intention and counter intention. Scientology and
Scientologists want to silence me, and I want to continue to
communicate.
This is a problem which Scientologists have paid millions to solve.
Silencing Armstrong is what your fees buy. Scientologists flagrantly,
willfully violate their own creed just to solve this problem. Just to
silence Gerry Armstrong.
And the problem has not gone away. In over twenty years, and at a cost
in the millions of dollars, a couple dozen law firms, 8 million
Scientologists, and probably that many lawyers, and still you've got
the same old problem. You still want to silence Armstrong, and
Armstrong refuses to be silenced.
I think you must agree that this is for Scientology and Scientologists
a major problem. It is so major that pretty well all of you are
beneficiaries of this problem by contract.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/a1/625.php
Search for "beneficiaries" and "releasees." That's you
Scientologists
and all your orgs and groups.
>
>1. Raise the Knowledge corner.
Okay, here we go. All you Scientologists apply the KRC triangle and
formula to the "Armstrong problem."
>
>How can you increase your knowledge about the problem?
Well how? You certainly can't increase your knowledge of Gerry
Armstrong. You've even put him on your net nanny. Even the word
"Gerry" is on your net nanny.
http://www.xenu.net/archive/events/censorship/wordlist.html
All you know or allowed to know about Gerry Armstrong is black PR,
that is to say, lies, which cannot be knowledge at all. All you can
know about him, since he's a critic of your cult's abuses and
criminality, is that he's a criminal. Hubbard says so, just as Hubbard
says you have to increase knowledge to solve the problem. Yet you
can't increase your knowledge because Hubbard doesn't allow you to.
All you can increase in your mind about Armstrong is the black PR on
him, and what is black PR but lies, the antithesis of knowledge.
You can't grasp that Hubbard and his illusion, Scientology, are the
problem, because they're also your service facsimile. They're what you
use to make yourself right and others (wogs (R) of course) wrong. So
you can't get rid of the problem, because the problem is what prevents
you from getting rid of it. So you make something the problem, which
isn't the problem - Gerry Armstrong - and attack it.
You can't increase your knowledge of any of them - Gerry Armstrong,
Hubbard or Scientology - because all that Scientology allows you to
increase is your illusions about all of them. If you ever began to
actually increase your knowledge of Gerry Armstrong, you'd discover
that he's not an SP, and you'd discover that Hubbard and Scientology
are completely wrong about Armstrong, SPs, wogs (R), Scientology,
Scientologists and Hubbard himself. You'd become a wog (R) yourself
and you'd have nothing more to do with Hubbard's KRC triangle.
If you still want to embrace and solve, or triumph in, your idiot
problem, however; that is, still pursue silencing Gerry Armstrong,
you'd have to study, obviously, what had been done that didn't work.
All those things I listed above -- the assaults, the lawsuits, the
black PR, the entrapment, the false charges, the warrants, the terror,
the threatened assassination -- have not worked. Then you'd have to
find or manufacture something else that would work.
Another lawsuit, this one for $10 million, including suing my friend
Bob Minton, hasn't worked.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/legal/a7/complaint-cv021632.html
Trying to get Armstrong in trouble with Russian intelligence and even
trying to get US agents in Russia to maybe kidnap him didn't work.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/osa-ltr-fsb-2001-04-20a.html
Armstrong is still communicating.
Isn't then Scientologists' only option to murder him? Don't
Scientology and Scientologists have to dispose of Armstrong, quietly
and without sorrow or not? Nothing else has silenced him or apparently
will silence him. But even a moron can see that murder silences
anyone. And doesn't that and that alone solve the problem for all of
Scientology's organizations and groups, and all their directors,
officers, employees, volunteers, lawyers, including the Lenskes
(oops), PIs and everyone to whom any of them wants to assign this
wonderful benefit? Isn't that what is in the Scientology mind --
murder? Isn't that end result of all Scientology's KRC and ARC?
But let's hear from your Scientologists. Let's hear what you come up
with when you raise the knowledge corner of your triangle. Let's hear
how can you increase your knowledge about the problem. Let's hear if
you have a different solution from murder for the problem. How else
can you silence Gerry Armstrong, to make yourselves right and him
wrong?
>What do
>you need to learn about it?
But you can't learn about what you need to learn about because that is
specifically prohibited by Scientology.
> What should you study to better
>understand the problem?
And you can't study what you should study to better understand the
problem because that too is specifically prohibited by Scientology. It
wouldn't do any good to study more of Hubbard's tech on using the law
to harass, or black PRing people, or suing people to shudder them into
silence, because that hasn't worked. I mean, six lawsuits later it
should be clear. An Everest of Scientology cult black propaganda, with
every lie imaginable about me, hasn't worked. You folks paid a crooked
cop $10K for a phony authorization to videotape me, and you even have
me swearing on tape (oops). You tried Hubbard's tech on manufacturing
threat, evidence and false testimony numerous times. And still I'm
communicating; in proof of which fact I'll end this sentence with a
dot.
You can, as I've mentioned above, study Hubbard's basic-basic evil
intention for Scientologists: to dispose of wogs (R) like me quietly
and without sorrow. And you can study assassination tech. But let's
hear from the Scientologists. What do you think you can study to
better understand the Gerry Armstrong problem?
>
>2. Raise the Responsibility corner.
I really hope you don't do this because I'd be a goner. But let's hear
from you anyway.
>
>How can you take more ownership for the problem?
It really is your problem. You really do own it. You're contracted to
it.
But this might be a silliness. Is ownership really a sliding scale?
This deserves some thought, but perhaps by someone else. I mean you
can own a house, or you can not own a house. But if you don't own a
house, can you take more ownership of it? Or only if the house is a
problem? I think "ownership" may be a sillness here.
In the case of the Armstrong problem, Scientologists should be
rejecting all ownership in it. If every Scientologist said that they
do not want to be beneficiaries of the cult's insane silence
"contract," that would be the end of the problem. If on the other
hand, as they're doing, Scientologists say that they really want to
own their insane "contract" and even try to take more ownership for
it, they're really stuck. More ownership would mean murder, wouldn't
it?
> What parts of
>the problem are you responsible for?
I am responsible for all the communicating I've been doing, but
Scientologists are responsible for the bad acts, abuse, lies, fraud
and criminality I'm communicating about. Scientologists are
responsible for all the attacks to which my communications are
responses.
Scientologists are responsible for the insane "contract" to
which
they
are "beneficiaries." I certainly never wanted such a suppressive
contract, never asked for it, and reject its silence conditions
completely.
It is clearly Scientologists' responsibility to get out of the
contract by which they seek to silence and suppress me. I can't do it.
All I can do is continue with every word to violate it so that
Scientologists at some point grasp how suppressive and idiotic the
"contract" is, and that for the problem to go away, this side of
murder, they have to cancel it.
>Can you accept
>responsibility for the parts you did not cause?
Now that part is really silly. No you cannot. Leave it at that. And
you don't have to try to perform this silliness to simply stop trying
to silence me. Each and every Scientologist, every lawyer and every
agent has the power within him or her right now to stand up and say
that they do not want to silence Gerry Armstrong, they do not want to
be beneficiaries of their suppressive gag "contract."
Scientologist do not do this, do not object to being beneficiaries of
this suppression because they want to be its beneficiaries. They want
to try to silence some wog (R) they hate. They want the problem just
so they can black PR him, frame him, sue him and destroy him. It's
what their fees buy, and they want to get their money's worth. By
becoming "more responsible," by filing more lawsuits, by generating
more black PR, by more lies, by more violent assaults, Scientologists
actually become less and less responsible.
And the more irresponsible Scientologists become, the more I have to
communicate in response to their irresponsibility. But won't ever-
increasing irresponsibility naturally end in murder? Must I not
become, in order for Scientology and Scientologists to be right, as
Hubbard said, dead wrong?
>
>3. Raise the Control corner.
Oh goody. Just imagine how neat it is to be controlled by Scientology
and Scientologists. No wonder I'm a problem.
>
>What part of the problem can you control?
That's funny. Other than by murder, the only way the problem will
disappear is by Scientologists stopping their ridiculous efforts to
control me.
It is Scientologists' obsessive effort to raise the control corner
that has caused their huge problem. It is a Scientology-wide idiocy --
the effort to control that which should not and cannot be controlled.
This is so much a part of Scientology that the cultists, to convince
themselves and others that Scientology works, routinely hallucinate
that they're controlling things, people or conditions that they don't
control at all. See, e.g., Advance's OT wins.
Adults learn what they can control and should control and generally go
about controlling those things and leaving the things they cannot
control and should not control to other people or to God.
Scientologists cannot learn this, so never become adults. They are
childish. But they are childish with a billion dollars to go out and
destroy people, or, as with me, to try to silence them.
And instead of learing what adults learn, to not try to control the
uncontrollable, Scientologists practice KRC and do whatever is
necessary, no matter how insane or criminal, to raise their control
corners.
> How could you take a
>little more control for the other parts?
You mean control *of* the other parts, right?
Well, let's hear from you Scientologists. How can you take control of
the Gerry Armstrong problem? Oh you can't, you say, because DM won't
let you. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. You're stuck with being beneficiaries of
an evil, suppressive "contract," which violates your own creed,
because you really can't handle a much smaller problem, DM. I'll never
stop talking unless you murder me, but half a dozen of you could talk
some sense into your nanodictator.
Oh heck, what am I saying, don't you enjoy having people framed,
abused, black PRed, hated, sued and destroyed? Isn't that what you pay
But this idea of raising control in any situation and doing it
repeatedly without limitation to handle problems is idiotic, and even
dangerous, because in many problems, particularly Scientology's and
Scientologists' problems, too much control or too much effort to
control *is* the problem. But the Scientologists, because they're only
permitted to raise their control corners in any problem, make the
problem worse and worse.
They should have let Lisa McPherson go, out of their control, but
instead, because they had to obsessively raise their control corners
in the problem, they controlled her to death. They locked her up to
control her. They drugged her to control her. They lied to her to
control her. They lied to the police to control them. They lie to all
wogs (R) to control us.The Scientology cultists could not relinquish
control to the people who really ought to have had control over Lisa's
mental and physical health, and they killed her rather than give up
that control.
It is expected that the Scientology cultists, because they are not
permitted to learn from what doesn't work (see below), will try to
control me by death as well. They should let me go. They should stop
trying to silence me. They should stop trying to have me locked up.
They should stop trying to control me. But they cannot, because that
would not be raising their control corners. Ultimate control is
causing a condition of death.
>
>4. Ignore the losses.
Oh that's rich.
>
>If you focus on losses or failures, they get bigger and more
>overwhelming. You then pull in even more losses. So find ways to
>ignore these losses.
Oh, yes, make sure you don't learn. Stay ignorant. What a terriblly
stupid message from Hubbard and you.
And how terribly threatening. Applying this to your Armstrong problem,
your more than twenty years of losses in your efforts to silence me
must be ignored. Ignore the fact that your mountains of lies and black
PR about me hasn't worked. Tell more and more and ever greater lies.
Tells lies, tell more lies, and tell other people to tell lies.
Ignore the fact that all your efforts to frame me for crimes were a
complete loss. Frame me even more for even more heinous crimes. Ignore
the fact that your assaults haven't stopped me from communicating. No,
commit more assaults, more violent assaults. Ignore the fact all the
millions you've spent bringing all those lawsuits are a total loss.
Spend more millions, hire more lawyers, file more lawsuits, buy more
judges, corrupt more courts. And if that doesn't work, and is just a
loss, well ignore that too. Spend billions, hire every lawyer in the
world, file a thousand more lawsuits, buy every judge, corrupt every
court.
So, go ahead all you Scientologists, play your nasty mental tricks
with yourselves, find ways to ignore your losses. Ignore all the times
your assaults, lies, crimes and evil didn't work, and just keep those
assaults, lies, crimes and evils coming. Otherwise you'd pull in even
more losses. Wouldn't that be too bad! Wouldn't it be too bad if you
cognited that your assaults, lies, crimes and evils didn't work. No,
go ahead, ignore those losses.
>
>If ignoring losses is difficult, try writing them down on a
>sheet of paper and then destroy the paper. Shift your attention.
That's right. That's being responsible. Shift your attention away from
your evil deeds, your crimes, your suppressions of good people. That's
pretty OT. Don't confront what you're doing. Shift your attention.
>Stop talking or thinking about them. Avoid people who bring them
>up. Move on.
That's right, never discuss the evil you do to suppress and silence
people. Move on. Ignore it. That's being OT. That's being responsible.
That's raising your knowledge corner all right.
Avoid people who might say that what you're doing to Gerry Armstrong,
and a thousand other wogs (R), to silence us is not only not working
but wrong. And not only avoid such people, but do the same thing to
them. Silence them too. Assault them, black PR them, sue them, frame
them and shudder them into silence. Lock them up, drug them, and if
you really raise your control corner kill them. And then ignore the
losses, stop thinking about them. And if anyone brings up the prisons,
drugs and death, well avoid them or imprison, drug and kill them too.
And move on.
>
>If you catch yourself dwelling on losses, knock it off.
Yes, if you catch yourself thinking about the assaults on Armstrong,
all the lies you've told about him, all the black PR you forward, all
the times you've tried to have him jailed on false criminal charges,
the millions you've paid to corrupt lawyers, the courts you've
corrupted, all your lawsuits, knock it off. If you think all that evil
is a loss, knock it off.
> Put your
>attention elsewhere.
Sure, put your attention on what else you can do to silence Armstrong.
Don't think about the assaults, the lies, the frame jobs, the
lawsuits, the threats and the terror, all those things which haven't
worked. No, think elsewhere. Think about what will work. Murder, now
that will work. Murder will silence anyone. Yes, think about murder.
Put your attention elsewhere. Where else is there to put it but
murder. You've tried pretty well everything else, and you're not to
put your attention there.
>Stop talking about losses.
But that's all there is. All of your assaults, lies, frameups, false
charges, lawsuits, injunctions, arrest warrants, threats and terror
are losses. So don't talk about them. What's left to talk about then.
Oh, yes, murder. That silences people. That should be okay to talk
about.
> And learn to
>ignore the failures of others as well.
Sure, ignore the failure of every Scientology organization, including
CST (oops), and all your front groups, and all their directors,
officers, employees, volunteers, and all their PIs, agents and
lawyers. Even ignore the failures of the Lenskes (oops). Ignore the
failure of every beneficiary of your suppressive silence "contact."
Ignore the failure of all of their lies, assaults, black PR, lawsuits,
threat and terror. That's really raising your responsibility corner..
That's raising your knowledge corner. Ignore it all. That's keeping
KRC working.
>
>5. Make the wins firm.
The only win in the Armstrong problem is when he's silenced. How can
all of you make the win firm, when you've had no win at all with what
you've done? How can you have a win to make firm when everything
you've done, all yours assaults, lies, lawsuits, warrants, threats and
terror have been losses? Clearly, murder. What else is there if you
are to win and make your win firm? Without death, your win could never
be firm. Without death I might still communicate. Yes, murder will
solve the Armstrong problem.
>
>What can you do to make your successes firm? How can you
>solidify them?
Well maybe you Scientologists have another solution. So let's hear
from you. How can you possibly have a success in your Gerry Armstrong
problem? And if you have a success, how can you make it firm? How do
you propose, if not by murder, to solidify your success in silencing
me?
>
>Maybe you can write them down or put them on a wall. Keep a
>record of your wins. Talk about them to everyone you can.
>Celebrate them.
Well yes, but there has been no win whatsoever to write down or put on
a wall. There is no record of even one win. If there had been a win I
would not be writing these words. There is nothing for you to talk
about. There are no wins for you to celebrate. The Armstrong problem
is still here. You all have an intention to silence me and I have an
intention to communicate. Houston, we've got a problem. Intention -
counter intention. And I'm still communicating.
You will only be able to write down your win, put it up on a wall,
keep a record of it, talk about it to everyone, and celebrate it when
you've completely silenced me. The way I see it, your only hope is
murder.
But I'd like to hear from all you Scientologists, and even your
lawyers and your agents, who have this gargantuan Gerry Armstrong
problem. What can and will you do to win, so that you can write that
win down, put it up on a wall, keep a record of it, talk about it to
everyone, and celebrate it? Put that old KRC to work on this problem.
>
>Also, make a habit of finding and focusing on the wins of others.
Well you do that at least. Your cult boss David Miscavige recently
celebrated your shooting down SPs like ducks in a pond. Presumably
those wogs (R) at least you were able to silence.
>The more attention you put on success, the more success you get.
I suppose that's true. The more attention you put on silencing people,
the more you assault them, lie about them, frame them, sue them, get
sherrifs to hunt them down, imprison them, threaten them and terrorize
them, the more silence you'll get. I suppose if you keep pumping
billions to rotten lawyers to get rotten courts to silence people,
you're bound to get more success.
But getting back to the Armstrong problem, you've had no success
whatsoever. You have no success to put your attention on. And really,
putting your attention on other people like me who you've shot down
like ducks in a pond does absolutely nothing. I'm still communicating.
No, with me you actually have to take a gun and shoot me down like a
duck in a pond personally. You can't just think about the successes
you've had shooting down other people you've wanted to silence, you
have to pull a real trigger.
>Some of your answers to these questions are easy, enjoyable
>steps. Do those right now! You will see a sudden improvement in
>the problem.
Okay, I've done the steps as well as I can, and tried to answer for
all you Scientologists who actually have the Gerry Armstrong problem.
But I'd like to hear how any of you Scientologists did on your
application of KRC to me.
You write that it is applicable to any situation and works every time,
yet I'm still here communicating, and all of you still have this
frightfully huge problem. So KRC *must* be BS. It must not work. This
makes sense, because virtually all of Scientology does not work. It's
because I say it doesn't work, and prove right here that it doesn't
work, that all of you want to silence me. It's because I communicate
that Scientology does not work, which it does not, that you have
assaulted me, framed me, black PRed me, sued me six times, sent your
sheriffs to hunt me down, tried to imprison me, threatened me and
terrorized me. It is because I say Scientology does not work, and
prove it just by communicating, that you all consider me this gigantic
problem
>
>Then do the tougher steps you wrote.
Well, the toughest step has to be murder. You've tried everything else
haven't you? But maybe you Scientologists and you Scientology lawyers
have another step you'll take to silence me. All I can imagaine is
that you'll have to murder me. That's a tough step, but it's what
Hubbard urges. He also insists that it be done quietly and without
sorrow, but that shouldn't be a problem. None of you I've ever
observed are the least bit sorrowful about the assaults, the frame
jobs, the black PR, the sheriffs, the lawsuits, the false charges, the
threats, the terror, the imprisonments, or your shooting down other
SPs like ducks in a pond. Being unsorrowful about murdering me
shouldn't be any problem for all of you, should it?
But maybe you Scientologists do have some tougher steps this side of
murder to silence me that I haven't thought of. Let me know if you've
come up with any in your KRC application process.
>Once you start on them you
>will find they are not so tough after all.
That makes the likelihood of murder even more worrisome. Once you
Scientologists really put your mind to murdering me, in order to have
a big win to put on your walls and celebrate, it won't be so tough
after all. It is true that serial murderers start with one, and they
probably also find after the first that it's not so tough after all.
And, as DM says, you're already into shooting down SPs like ducks in a
pond. That clearly wasn't so tough after all as well.
>
>If following these five steps does not completely solve the
>problem, repeat the steps until the problem is gone forever.
Well there you go. Look what I have to look forward to until I'm gone
forever. More assaults, more lies, more black PR, more framing, more
false criminal charges, more crooked lawyers, more lawsuits, more
warrants, more corrupt courts, more threats, more terror, more raising
the knowledge corner, more assaults, more lies, more black PR, more
framing, more false criminal charges, more crooked lawyers, more
lawsuits, more warrants, more corrupt courts, more threats, more
terror, more raising the responsibility corner, more assaults, more
lies, more black PR, more framing, more false criminal charges, more
crooked lawyers, more lawsuits, more warrants, more corrupt courts,
more threats, more terror, more raising the control corner, more
assaults, more lies, more black PR, more framing, more false criminal
charges, more crooked lawyers, more lawsuits, more warrants, more
corrupt courts, more threats, more terror, more ignoring of the
losses, more shifting of attention, more not talking about it all, and
finally, so you're able to write down your win, put it up on a wall,
keep a record of it, talk about it to everyone, and celebrate it,
sorrowlessly shoot me down like a duck in a pond.
>
>As well as solving problems for you, these steps will start to
>bring out the best in you.
You'll celebrate the ideal of your code of honor. You never feared to
hurt another in your cause. Isn't that the best in Scientologists?
Assaults, lies, black PR, false charges, lawsuits, imprisonment,
threats, terror, and, to get that win to put up on your wall and
celebrate, murder? That solves the problem, and brings out the best in
all those beneficiaries, all those Scientologists and all their
lawyers.
>You will discover a new sense of
>command over life that you have always had, but never used.
Yes, a command over life and death.
>
>Use the KRC Triangle to release the real powerhouse you know
>that you are.
Obviously every Scientologist who is a beneficiary of the cult's
suppressive silence "contract" has been applying the KRC triangle
for
years to the Gerry Armstrong problem. It hasn't worked. You all still
have a monumental problem with me. I say that the only way you can
release the real powerhouses you say you know you are, so you can have
a win for your wall and something to celebrate, is to murder me. Do
any of you have any other idea?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Copyright © 2002 TipsForSuccess.org. All rights reserved.
>Grateful acknowledgment is made to L. Ron Hubbard Library for
>permission to reproduce selections from the copyrighted works of
>L. Ron Hubbard.
© Gerry Armstrong
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org