|
|
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3DED23AF.6020404%40starshadowlovesxenu.net&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
From: Starshadow <starshadow@starshadowlovesxenu.net>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: CLairification of Fraud (was re: TECH Ouside COS.
OT 1 Success)
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 13:35:43 -0800
Organization: Lightlink Internet
Lines: 116
Message-ID: <3DED23AF.6020404@starshadowlovesxenu.net>
References: <3de7a981@news2.lightlink.com> <g42huusqo0d6977erof701c87e4ocdamdv@4ax.com>
<3DE8D935.3060204@starshadowlovesxenu.net> <6s4nuu8pss7m0ail59t616hqptptt88asn@4ax.com>
<okbnuuso4q5of6nsf36prq24gbjc7rqfng@4ax.com> <kehnuuokjs8ilurqjhhtjd5kmemtapm2dp@4ax.com>
<ckqnuus5ape8if1mt4npvlb8aablgnn77k@4ax.com> <cv2puug8ma4qb9i4ltbqvt5toscfp5icl2@4ax.com>
<3deca55e.1982640@news.bway.net> <u12quu0ddvek586b213llgmn2tj6hqna37@4ax.com>
<3DED1169.6000706@starshadowlovesxenu.net> <lb7quugvvh9tg2tjv4pp2pptv9mqt35301@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.16.34.12
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.228.36.44
X-Original-Trace: 3 Dec 2002 16:35:59 -0500, 12.228.36.44
Caroline Letkeman wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:17:45 -0800, Starshadow
> <starshadow@starshadowlovesxenu.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Caroline Letkeman wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:48:41 GMT, referen@bway.net (Diane Richardson)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 11:55:57 +0100, Caroline Letkeman
>>>><caroline@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 18:20:40 -0500, ptsc <ptsc AT nym DOT
>>>>>cryptofortress DOT com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:46:50 +0100, Caroline Letkeman
>>>>>><caroline@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:05:22 -0500, ptsc <ptsc
AT nym DOT
>>>>>>>cryptofortress DOT com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 18:33:40 +0100, Caroline Letkeman
>>>>>>>><caroline@gerryarmstrong.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>Ha ha ha ha ha.
>>>>>>>>>That Starshadow is authenticating Claire as
a declared SP is as
>>>>>>>>>priceless as the gains of Scientology. It's
like Dave Kluge certifying
>>>>>>>>>Mike Rinder as a reformer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That you're calling Starshadow OSA is as kooky
as Koos auditing
>>>>>>>>Diana Ross.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Flunk. You dubbed in, ptsc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Take your Scientology gibberish somewhere else. Have you
considered
>>>>>>that maybe you should actually quit practicing Scientology
now that you're
>>>>>>pretending to be a critic of it?
>>>>>
>>>>><snip balderdash>
>>>>>
>>>>>This is rich. I double checked and this is still
>>>>>alt.religion.scientology. This is where we talk about Scientology,
>>>>>right? But according to ptsc, I should "take my Scientology
gibberish
>>>>>somewhere else."
>>>>
>>>>Your continued use of Hubbardspeak indicates quite clearly you
>>>>still view the world from a cultic mindset, Caroline.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Even funnier, really, since every time ptsc posts a usenet
message
>>>>>here, he is using "Scientology gibberish," his chosen
handle being a
>>>>>Scientology term.
>>>>
>>>>The difference is that Rob Clark uses Hubbardspeak as a joke.
>>>>You, on the other hand, still use it to form your opinions. That's
>>>>a big, big difference.
>>>
>>>
>>>This is quite amazing. How in the world did Diane recognize that Rob
>>>Clark was joking? I don't believe I've ever seen Diane recognize a
>>>joke before.
>>
>> Then you are blind as well as insane. Diane and I have our
>>differences, but even I've seen her recognize --and even
>>institute--humor before. But then your kind of humor seems to specialize
>>in pratfalls and hilarious accusations of conspiracies.
>>
>>Now, are you going to remove my postings--which, again, I did NOT
>>authorize YOU to archive and whose copywrite remains mine--from your
>>stupid webpages or am I going to have to complain to your isp or phone
>>company?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>Not having CofS resources, I doubt I can sue, but I can make
>>complaint after complaint until you comply.
>
>
> Do you think we need your authorization to web your goony complaint
> after goony complaint?
>
>
Okayfine. You've declared
war. So be it. I can't, as I said, afford
any batteries of copywrite lawyers, but I will be certain to point out
that you are violating MY copywrites to all and sundry. People can judge
for themselves what kind of low life scum you are.
And to think I was once cordial with you. Bitch. I hope your karma
catches up with you soonest. And may your front wheels meet your rear
wheels in a close and loving embrace.
---
Bright Blessings,
Starshadow, KoX, SP5, Official
Wiccan Chaplain ARSCC(wdne)
"Scientology in 1986, after fraud judgement in favor
of ex-member Lawrence Wollersheim --'Not one thin dime for
Wollersheim'
Scientology May 9, 2002 before final appeal--
86,746,430 Thin Dimes for Wollersheim." www.factnet.org
www.xenu.net --what the Church of Scientology doesn't want
you to see
|